Test Bench: The AMT200P Pro Sound AMT and XMT200 Horn from Eighteen Sound

February 2 2022, 15:10
This driver from Eighteen Sound is a spectacular new transducer for the pro sound community. As I mentioned in previous Test Bench review/explications, Eighteen Sound was founded in 1997. After a long successful run, Eighteen Sound (and Ciare) was acquired by BC Speakers in 2017, however, Eighteen Sound continues as a discrete brand separate from B&C Speakers.
 
Photo 1: Close-up view of the Eighteen Sound AMT200P.
Photo 2: The Eighteen Sound AMT200P AMT and XMT200 waveguide.
Following the acquisition, Voice Coil hadn’t featured any of the new products from Eighteen Sound until the April 2021 issue of Voice Coil, so I have been trying to make up for that “pause.” This month, Eighteen Sound sent its latest entry into the high-end pro sound high-frequency transducer category, but the company did not send me another compression driver. Instead it sent the AMT200P, a new high SPL Air Motion Transformer (AMT) — sometimes also known as an Air Velocity Transformer (AVT) — and its accompanying horn, the 6.5" XMT200.

The Eighteen Sound AMT200P is only the third pro sound AMT that I have characterized in Test Bench, the first two being the Beyma TPL200/H in the July 2018 issue and the Beyma TPL75 in the August 2018 issue. There has been a “renaissance” in AMTs over the last several years, and we now find them showing up not only in home audio, but in pro sound, in both studio monitors and PA applications.

Features for the Eighteen Sound AMT200P include a 167mm×31mm (6.57”×1.22”) rectangular throat with a Polyimide (Kapton) diaphragm. This driver has a nominal 8Ω impedance (also available in 16Ω), a neodymium magnet structure, AES power handling of 90W (180W continuous) above 1.2kHz, sensitivity of 105dB, a recommended crossover frequency of 1.2kHz at 48dB/octave, and a net weight of 7.5lb (3.4kg). This AMT also has a damped rear cavity that includes a black emissive coating and heatsink fins for cooling enhancement. The magnetic system in this driver is extremely strong with a flux density of 0.82T. I made the mistake of getting the two samples in too close proximity of each other, and they became magnetically attached, making it a bit of a science project to separate them.

While the AMT200P can be used as a standard planar device (Photo 1), Eighteen Sound also has a dedicated waveguide available, the 90°×20° XMT200 (Photo 2). The XMT200 is a constant directivity horn (down to 600Hz) constructed out of aluminum and optimized for heat dissipation when coupled to the AMT200P. Photo 3 and Photo 4 give the horizontal and vertical directivity spectrograms for the XMT200, respectively.
 
Photo 3: Eighteen Sound XMT200 horizontal plane horizontal directivity spectrogram
Photo 4: Eighteen Sound XMT200 vertical plane vertical directivity spectrogram

I commenced testing using the LinearX LMS analyzer to produce the 300-point stepped sine wave impedance plot shown in Figure 1, with the solid black curve showing the AMT200P mounted on the XMT200 waveguide and the dashed blue curve representing the planar transducer without the waveguide. With nominal 8Ω impedance, the AMT200P has a 4.92Ω DCR, with minimum impedance mounted on the XMT200 waveguide of 4.97Ω and at 3.39kHz.
 
Figure 1: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 free-air impedance plot.

For the first set of SPL measurements, I free-air mounted the Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT20 combination without an enclosure and measured both the horizontal on- and off-axis at 2.0V/0.5m (normalized to 2.83V/1m) from 0° on-axis to 60° off-axis using the LoudSoft FINE R+D analyzer and GRAS 46BE microphone (supplied courtesy of LoudSoft and GRAS Sound & Vibration). Figure 2 displays the on-axis frequency response of the AMT driver/horn, which is relatively smooth ±3dB response from 700Hz to 15.1kHz with no major anomalies. Figure 3 shows the 0° to 60° on- and off-axis response in the horizontal plane with Figure 4 displaying the normalized horizontal plane response. Figure 5 shows the 180° horizontal polar plot (in 10° increments with1/3 octave smoothing applied), generated by the CLIO Pocket analyzer and accompanying microphone (courtesy of Audiomatica SRL).
 
Figure 2: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 on-axis frequency response.
Figure 3: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 horizontal on- and off-axis frequency response (0°=black; 15°=blue; 30°=green; 45°=purple; 60°=blue).
Figure 4: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 normalized horizontal on- and off-axis frequency response (0°=black; 15°=blue; 30°=green; 45°=purple; 60°=blue).
Figure 5: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 0° to 180° horizontal plane polar plot (in 10° increments).

For the vertical waveguide orientation, Figure 6 depicts the vertical on- and off-axis from 0° to 60°. Figure 7 shows the normalized version of Figure 6. Figure 8 shows the vertical plane polar plot. Last, Figure 9 gives the two-sample SPL comparison, showing the two Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 samples to be closely matched within ≤1 dB throughout the drivers’ operating range.
 
Figure 6: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 vertical on- and off-axis frequency response (0°=black; 15°=blue; 30°=green; 45°=purple; 60°=blue).
Figure 7: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 normalized vertical on- and off-axis frequency response (0°=black; 15°=blue; 30°=green; 45°=purple; 60°=blue).
Figure 8: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 0° to 180° vertical plane polar plot (in 10° increments).
Figure 8: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 0° to 180° vertical plane polar plot (in 10° increments).
Figure 9: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 two-sample SPL comparison.

Since the AMT200P can also be employed in applications such as high output studio monitors without the XMT200 waveguide, I did a series of measurements sans the waveguide. For these response measurements, I flush-mounted the driver in an enclosure with a 16.5”×11” baffle and measured the response on-axis to 45° off-axis. The on-axis response is shown in Figure 10, with the 0° to 45° curves given in Figure 11. Looking at the comparison of the AMT200P’s response illustrated in Figure 12 with and without the XMT200, it is obvious that the waveguide substantially equalized to response below 4kHz and smoothed out the peak at 13.9kHz. In a powered monitor scenario with DSP, this is certainly not an issue.
 
Figure 10: Eighteen Sound AMT200P on-axis frequency response.
Figure 11: Eighteen Sound AMT200P horizontal on- and off-axis frequency response (0°=black; 15°=blue; 30°=green; 45°=purple).
Figure 12: Comparison between the Eighteen Sound AMT200P with an without the XMT200 waveguide.
For the remaining series of tests, I again set up the Listen, Inc. AudioConnect analyzer and 1/4” SCM microphone (provided courtesy of Listen, Inc.) to measure distortion and generate time-frequency plots. For the distortion measurement, I mounted the Eighteen Sound’s AMT200P/XMT200 combination in free-air in the same manner that I used for the frequency response measurements, and set the SPL to 104dB at 1m (2.26V), determined by using a pink noise stimulus generator and internal SLM in the SoundCheck V18 software. I then measured the distortion with the Listen microphone placed 10cm from the mouth of the horn. This produced the distortion curves shown in Figure 13, exhibiting very low third-order harmonic content.
 
Figure 13: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 SoundCheck distortion plots.

Following this test sequence, I set up SoundCheck 18 to generate a 2.83V/1m impulse response curve for this driver/horn combination and imported the data into Listen’s SoundMap Time/Frequency software. The resulting cumulative spectral decay (CSD) waterfall plot is given in Figure 14 and the Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) plot is shown in Figure 15.
 
Figure 14: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 SoundCheck CSD waterfall plot.
Figure 15: Eighteen Sound AMT200P/XMT200 SoundCheck STFT plot.

After reviewing all the objective measurement data presented here, the Eighteen Sound AMT200P driver and XMT200 waveguide are obviously well-engineered, exhibiting good performance and outstanding build quality. Whether the application is in PA systems (including line source applications), or used as a high-performance high-frequency transducer in a studio monitor, it’s great for the industry to be offered another ~1000Hz alternative. For more information about this and other Eighteen Sound OEM pro sound products, visit
www.eighteensound.com. VC

This article was originally published in Voice Coil, November 2021.
Page description
About Vance Dickason
Vance Dickason has been working as a professional in the loudspeaker industry since 1974. A contributing editor to Speaker Builder magazine (now audioXpress) since 1986, in November 1987 he became editor of Voice Coil, the monthly Periodical for the Loudspeake... Read more

related items