Test Bench: The MD60N-6 2.5" Dome Midrange from the SB Acoustics Satori Line

December 21 2022, 17:10
Over the last several years, Indonesian-based Sinar Baja Electric in partnership with Danesian Audio of Denmark (Danesian Audio was founded by of a team of dedicated Danish loudspeaker engineers, who have been working closely together since 1997), have generated an excellent reputation for the high-end home and car audio drivers that have been marketed under the SB Acoustics name. For This Test Bench, SB Acoustics sent Voice Coil the MD60N-6, a new 2.5” diameter soft dome midrange from its premium high-end Satori line (Photo 1).
 
Photo 1: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 2.5” driver

Features for the MD60N-6 include a non-resonant coated cloth 2.5” diameter diaphragm and surround, a 60.5mm diameter voice coil wound with round copper wire on a vented aluminum voice coil former. The motor system consists of large neodymium (neo) ring magnet with a low carbon content steel return. The device incorporates a dynamic dome stabilizer and flow resistor, which takes the form of a 1mm thick perforated dome-shaped aluminum grille that sits underneath the soft-dome (spaced 2mm to 3mm). There is also a damping pad mounted directly on the back side (covering its entire surface). This fires into the injection-molded back-closed transmission line enclosure that is filled with Thinsulate (acoustic/thermal insulation material). Other features include 95dB 2.83V/1m sensitivity, a machined aluminum faceplate, gold-plated terminals, braided silver Litz wire tinsel leads located on opposite side of the dome to minimize voice coil rocking, a 120W-rated power handling, 0.5mm Xmax, and a nominal 6Ω impedance.

Testing commenced using the LinearX LMS analyzer to produce the 300-point impedance sweep illustrated in Figure 1. With nominal 6Ω impedance, the MD60N has a 5.25Ω DCR, with minimum impedance mounted of 5.8Ω and at 2kHz.
 
Figure 1: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 impedance plot

Following the impedance test, I recess mounted the SB Acoustics midrange dome in an enclosure with a baffle area of 15”×6” and measured the on- and off-axis frequency response again using the Loudsoft FINE R+D analyzer (provided to Voice Coil by Loudsoft) and the GRAS 46BE 1/4” microphone (courtesy of GRAS Sound & Vibration), which were set up to measure the 200Hz to 40kHz frequency response (using a 192kHz sampling rate) at 2V/0.5m normalized to 2.83V/1m. Sweeps were performed at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°.

Figure 2 shows the on-axis response of the SB Acoustics midrange dome, which measured ±2dB from 0.73kHz to 14.8kHz, when it began its second-order low-pass roll-off.
 
Figure 2: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 on-axis frequency response

Figure 3 gives the on- and off-axis response of the MD60N-6 midrange dome. Figure 4 shows the off-axis curves normalized to the on-axis response. Figure 5 displays the CLIO 180° polar plot (measured in 10° increments with 1/3 octave smoothing). The device is –3dB down at 30° off-axis with respect to the on-axis at about 3.5kHz, likely the highest crossover frequency that should be considered to produce an adequate system power response.
 
Figure 3: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 horizontal on- and off-axis frequency response (0°=black; 15°=blue; 30°=green; 45°=purple)
Figure 4: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 normalized on- and off-axis frequency response (0°=black; 15°=blue; 30°=green; 45°=purple)
Figure 5: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 180° horizontal plane CLIO polar plot (in 10° increments)

Figure 6 shows the two-sample SPL comparison of the SB Acoustics Satori midrange dome, indicating the two samples were closely matched to within 0.5dB throughout its operating range from 700Hz to 15kHz.
 
Figure 6: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 two-sample SPL comparison

I fired up the Listen, Inc. SoundCheck AudioConnect analyzer along with the Listen Inc. SCM 2 1/4” microphone (provided courtesy of Listen, Inc.) and measured the impulse response with the midrange dome recess mounted on the same 15”×6” test baffle. Importing this data into the Listen SoundMap software produced the cumulative spectral decay plot (commonly referred to as a “waterfall” plot) shown in Figure 7.
Figure 8 depicts the Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) displayed as a surface map plot.
 
Figure 7: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 SoundCheck CSD waterfall plot
Figure 8: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 SoundCheck STFT surface intensity plot

Then, I set the 1m SPL to 94dB (2.86V) using a pink noise stimulus, and measured the second and third harmonic distortion at 10cm, illustrated in Figure 9. Distortion is dominated by the second harmonic with a very low third harmonic distortion, however even the second harmonic content is well below 1% above 1kHz.
 
Figure 9: SB Acoustics Satori MD60N-6 SoundCheck distortion plots

The build quality of the MD60N-6, like all SB Acoustics’ drivers (especially the Satori line products), is definitely appropriate to the high-end two-channel and studio monitor market for which it is intended. So, given all the data collected for the MD60N-6 midrange dome, I would have say that SB Acoustics has created another highly useful transducer. For more information the SB Acoustics Satori MD60N midrange dome and other home hi-fi drivers, car audio, and pro sound drivers, visit the SB Acoustics website at www.sbacoustics.com. VC

This article was originally published in Voice Coil, August 2022
Page description
About Vance Dickason
Vance Dickason has been working as a professional in the loudspeaker industry since 1974. A contributing editor to Speaker Builder magazine (now audioXpress) since 1986, in November 1987 he became editor of Voice Coil, the monthly Periodical for the Loudspeake... Read more

related items